EXPERIMENTAL MODELING OF ADHESION DISEASE IN RATS
Abstract
The persistent causes of adhesion formation in the abdominal cavity remain inflammatory processes, previous abdominal surgeries, blunt and sharp abdominal trauma, including those of military origin, and congenital adhesions. According to the literature, peritoneal adhesion disease remains common in emergency surgery, with its incidence showing no decline. Acute adhesive intestinal obstruction ranks first among causes of intestinal obstruction of various origins. The severity of complications and postoperative mortality related to this condition show no tendency to decrease.
Currently, there are no experimental methods for inducing adhesion formation in the abdominal cavity of rats that closely mimic practical surgical conditions.
Objective: To develop and study, in an experimental setting, the morphological manifestations of the adhesion process using our proposed method of inducing adhesions in the abdominal cavity of rats, which would be as close as possible to the current clinical requirements of operative surgery.
Materials and Methods: Laparotomy, macroscopic, microscopic, histological examination (preparation of slide specimens), staining with hematoxylin and eosin, statistical analysis using Fisher’s exact test, determination of median adhesion formation frequency, interquartile range, and confidence interval for the median.
Results: No adhesions formed in animals of the control group. In the second group, on day 7 after adhesion induction, 90 % of rats showed thin membranous avascular adhesions that were easily disrupted. In the third group, on day 14, adhesions were observed in 90 % of animals; these were denser, partially vascularized, and required blunt or sharp dissection. In the fourth group, on day 21, 80 % of rats exhibited dense adhesive bands with high vascularization. Histologically, a transition was noted from granulation tissue with dense infiltration (day 7) to mature fibrous tissue with minimal signs of inflammation (day 21).
Conclusions: Injury to the parietal peritoneum alone during laparotomy does not lead to adhesion formation. In most rats, the adhesion process progressed sequentially from thin membranous formations to dense fibrous tissue with vascularization. The visceral peritoneum was more prone to adhesion formation compared to the parietal peritoneum. Involvement of uninjured organs in the adhesion process indicates a systemic pathological process extending beyond local injury.
Downloads
References
Boiko VV, Yevtushenko DO, Taraban IA, Minukhin DV, Lavrynenko AS, Vyshniakov KA. Current state of diagnosis and treatment of patients with peritoneal adhesive disease. Kharkivska Khirurgichna Shchola. 2024;(1):84–87. http://doi.org/10.37699/2308-7005.1.2024.16
Boiko VV, Yevtushenko DA. [Genetic factors in the pathogenesis of peritoneal adhesion disease]. Visnyk Avitseny. 2015;2:26–30.
Tabian N, Swehli E, Boyd A, Umbreen A, Tabibian JH. Abdominal adhesions: A practical review of an often overlooked entity. Med. Surg. 2017 Jan;31:9–13.
Beyene RT, Kavalukas SL, Barbul A. Intra-abdominal adhesions: Anatomy, physiology, pathophysiology, and treatment. Curr Probl Surg. 2015 Jul;52(7):271–319. http://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpsurg.2015.05.001. Epub 2015 Jun 9. PMID: 26258583
Ellis H. Adhesions: the early history. Hosp Med. 2004 Jun;65(6):328–9. http://doi.org/10.12968/hosp.2004.65.6.13727. PMID: 15222205
Tang J, Xiang Z, Bernards MT, Chen S. Peritoneal adhesions: Occurrence, prevention and experimental models. Acta Biomater. 2020 Oct 15;116:84–104. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.08.036. Epub 2020 Aug 29. PMID: 32871282
Mutsaers SE, Birnie K, Lansley S, Herrick SE, Lim CB, Prêle CM. Mesothelial cells in tissue repair and fibrosis. Front Pharmacol. 2015 Jun 9;6:113. http://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2015.00113. PMID: 26106328; PMCID: PMC4460327
Mykytyn VZ. Laparoscopic viscerolysis combined with endoscopic nasogastric intestinal intubation in acute adhesive disease [dissertation]. Kharkiv; 2021. 167 p.
Ito T, Shintani Y, Fields L, Shiraishi M, Podaru MN, Kainuma S, Yamashita K, Kobayashi K, Perretti M, Lewis-McDougall F, Suzuki K. Cell barrier function of resident peritoneal macrophages in post-operative adhesions. Nat Commun. 2021;12:2232. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22536-y
Paіdarkina А, Kushch O. Peritoneal remodeling and changes in its lymphoid component in experimental modeling of adhesion disease in rats. Science Rise: Biological Science. 2024;4(37):10–16. doi: http://doi.org/10.15587/2519-8025.2024.301278
Vediappan RS, Bennett C, Bassiouni A, Smith M, Finnie J, Trochsler M, Psaltis AJ, Vreugde S, Wormald PJ. A Novel Rat Model to Test Intra-Abdominal Anti-adhesive Therapy. Front Surg. 2020 Apr 8;7:12. http://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.00012. PMID: 32322586; PMCID: PMC7158702
Zhang YD, Yao W, Wu CX, Chi QM, Zhang JY, Li M. Tropical application of halcinonide cream reduces the severity and incidence of intraperitoneal adhesions in a rat model. Am J Surg. 2002 Jul;184(1):74–77. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(02)00876-0. PMID: 12152622
Yilmaz HG, Tacyildiz IH, Keles C, Gedik E, Kilinc N. Micronized purified flavonoid fraction may prevent formation of intraperitoneal adhesions in rats. Fertil Steril. 2005 Oct;84 Suppl 2:1083–8. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.03.076. PMID: 16209997
Rasti M, Parvaresh E, Tavajoh S, Talaei M. The comparison of diphenhydramine HCl and Nedocromil sodium in prevention of abdominal postoperative adhesion formation in rat models: an experimental study. Int J Surg. 2007 Dec;5(6):384–7. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2007.04.013. Epub 2007 May 10. PMID: 17569604
Yetkin G, Uludag M, Citgez B, Karakoc S, Polat N, Kabukcuoglu F. Prevention of peritoneal adhesions by intraperitoneal administration of vitamin E and human amniotic membrane. Int J Surg. 2009 Dec;7(6):561–5. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.09.007. Epub 2009 Sep 30. PMID: 19800036
Pryor HI 2nd, O'Doherty E, Hart A, Owens G, Hoganson D, Vacanti JP, Masiakos PT, Sundback CA. Poly(glycerol sebacate) films prevent postoperative adhesions and allow laparoscopic placement. Surgery. 2009 Sep;146(3):490–7. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2009.04.012. Epub 2009 Jun 26. PMID: 19715806
Lalountas MA, Ballas KD, Skouras C, Asteriou C, Kontoulis T, Pissas D, Triantafyllou A, Sakantamis AK. Preventing intraperitoneal adhesions with atorvastatin and sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose: a comparative study in rats. Am J Surg. 2010 Jul;200(1):118–23. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.06.026. PMID: 20637345
Whang SH, Astudillo JA, Sporn E, Bachman SL, Miedema BW, Davis W, Thaler K. In search of the best peritoneal adhesion model: comparison of different techniques in a rat model. J Surg Res. 2011 May 15;167(2):245–50. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2009.06.020. Epub 2009 Jul 15. PMID: 20304431
Kraemer B, Wallwiener C, Rajab TK, Brochhausen C, Wallwiener M, Rothmund R. Standardised models for inducing experimental peritoneal adhesions in female rats. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:435056. http://doi.org/10.1155/2014/435056. Epub 2014 Apr 8. PMID: 24809049; PMCID: PMC3997962
Raisi A, Dezfoulian O, Davoodi F, Taheri S, Ghahremani S. Salvia miltiorrhiza hydroalcoholic extract inhibits postoperative peritoneal adhesions in rats. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2021;21:136. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-021-03300-7
Volianska AH. Pathogenetic justification of adhesion prevention in gynecological surgeries in women of reproductive age (clinical and experimental study) [dissertation]. Odesa; 2016. 324 p.
Choy KT, Le KDR, Kong JCH. Seprafilm® and adhesive small bowel obstruction in colorectal/abdominal surgery: an updated systematic review. BMC Surg. 2024;24:291. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02581-2
Zwicky SN, Stroka D, Zindel J. Sterile Injury Repair and Adhesion Formation at Serosal Surfaces. Front Immunol. 2021;12:684967. http://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.684967
Wang R, Guo T, Li J. Mechanisms of peritoneal mesothelial cells in peritoneal adhesion. Biomolecules. 2022;12(10):1498. http://doi.org/10.3390/biom12101498. PMID:36291710; PMCID:PMC9599397.
Paidarkina A. [The problem of choosing an experimental model of adhesive disease]. Moloda Nauka–2023: materialy naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii [Moloda Nauka–2023: Proceedings of scientific conference]. Zaporizhzhia, 2023, pp. 257–259. (In Ukrainian).
Khashchuk VS. Surgical treatment of adhesive disease in children using anti-adhesive agents (experimental and clinical study) [dissertation]. Chernivtsi; 2022. 255 p.
Akhmedov FT. Types and localization of abdominal adhesions after open operations (experimental study). Paediatr Surg (Ukraine). 2022;4(77):34–9. http://doi.org/10.15574/PS.2022.77.34
Kim S, Ko J, Choi J, Kang J, Lim C, Shin M, Lee D, Kim JW. Antigen–antibody interaction-derived bioadhesion of bacterial cellulose nanofibers to promote topical wound healing (Adv. Funct. Mater. 20/2022). Adv Funct Mater. 2022;32(20):2270113. http://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202270113
Devi S, Kapila R, Kapila S. A novel gut inflammatory rat model by laparotomic injection of peptidoglycan from Staphylococcus aureus. Arch Microbiol. 2022 Nov 1;204(11):684. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-022-03294-x. PMID: 36318321
Diamond MP, Linsky CB, Cunningham T, Constantine B, di Zerega GS. [Adhesion re-formation is reduced after barrier placement in cesarean sections]. Fertil Steril. 1987;47(5):727–729.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

























