CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DENTAL AND JAW SYSTEM STATE IN PERSONS WITH LOW MINERAL DENSITY BONE TISSUE

Vitalii  Luchynskyi; Yuliia  Luchynska; Liudmyla  Patskan; Lesia  Kuchyrka; Khrystyna  Pohoretska

doi:10.21272/eumj.2025;13(2):463-470

Vitalii Luchynskyi Department of Dentistry, I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University, Ternopil, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9339-2589
Yuliia Luchynska Department of Pediatric Dentistry, I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University, Ternopil, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8622-7334
Liudmyla Patskan Department of Dental Therapy, I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University, Ternopil, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2584-5942
Lesia Kuchyrka Department of Pediatric Dentistry, I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University, Ternopil, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4789-0330
Khrystyna Pohoretska Department of Dental Therapy, I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University, Ternopil, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6505-6086

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/eumj.2025;13(2):463-470

Keywords: maxillofacial system, age, sex, bone tissue, mineral density, optical density of bone tissue

Abstract

Introduction. Despite the fact that the process of osseointegration has been studied for many years, a number of issues concerning the specifics of dental implantation in the case of osteopathies of various genesis, ensuring good primary stability of the implant, further forecasting of dental implantation and prevention of postoperative complications remain unresolved.

The purpose. To study the state of bone tissue in people with defects of dentition against the background of osteopathy

Materials and methods. 148 patients with dentition defects of young and middle age were examined. All patients underwent densitometric studies of bone tissue to determine its mineral density. For the qualitative characterization of the cortical layer of the lower jaw, the mandibular-cortical index according to Klemetti E. and co-authors was used. The optical density of the bone tissue of the jaws was measured using Image Q software, developed in 2007 by the National Institutes of Health (Canada), which allows the analysis of any selected area of the jawbone in conventional brightness units (units of brightness) in gradations of gray: from 0 to 256.

Results. According to the mandibular-cortical index, a domination of C2 bone tissue type was found in men vs. women (55.41 vs. 32.43%). At the same time, in women with osteopenia, the C3 bone tissue type was diagnosed in 60.81% compared to 33.78% of men with osteopenia. However, the results of the study established that in men aged 18–44, the average values of the optical density of bone tissue probably did not differ from those in the comparison group (p>0.05) and at the same time, they were significantly lower: by 18.35% – in men of the older age group (р<0.05) and by 29.12% – among women of the older age group (р<0.001). Still, the optical density of bone tissue was characterized by lower values in women vs. men with osteopenia, and it tended to decrease with increasing age of the subjects, regardless of gender.

Conclusions. The conducted studies made it possible to conclude that the optical density of the bone tissue of the jaws in patients with osteopenia decreased with increasing age of the patients, but women had the lowest values in both age groups.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chappuis V, Avila-Ortiz G, Araújo M G, et al. Medication-related dental implant failure: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2018;29(16):55-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13137

Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Dental implants inserted in male versus female patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2015;42(9):709-722. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12308

Kern M, Behrendt C, Fritzer E, et al. 5-year randomized multicenter clinical trial on single dental implants placed in the midline of the edentulous mandible. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2021;32(2):212-221. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13692

Muller F, Al-Nawas B, Storelli S, et al. Small-diameter titanium grade IV and titanium-zirconium implants in edentulous mandibles: Ten-year results from a double-blind, randomised controlled split-mouth core-trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2024;35(1):77-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14199

Avetikov DS, Pronina OM, Lokes KP, Bukhanchenko OP. Suchasni uyavlennya pro umovy, shcho obmezhuyut vybir metodu implantatsiyi zubiv u verkhniy i nyzhniy shchelepakh.Visnyk problem biolohiyi ta medytsyny. 2017;4(3):20-27. https://doi.org/10.29254/2077-4214-2017-4-3-141-20-27

Kinash YuO, Kinash LV. Conceptual features of occlusal balance in the development and pathology of localized and generalized diseases of parodontal tissues in patients with partial tooth loss during orthopedic rehabilitation both on the natural teeth and those on dental implant. Ukrainian Dental Almanac. 2022;3:14-18. DOI:10.31718/2409-0255.3.2022.03

Oliveira MR, Gonçalves A, Gabrielli MAC, de Andrade CR, Scardueli CR, Pereira Filho VA. Кореляція різних методів оцінки якості кісток in vivo: спостережне дослідження. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;51(3):388-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2021.05.019

Aydemir CA, Arısan V. Accuracy of dental implant placement via dynamic navigation or the freehand method: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020;31(3):255-263. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13563. Epub 2019 Dec 29

Khaletska V, Komarytsia O. Modern technologies and methods of dental implant placement. Modern Medicine, Pharmacy and Psychological Health. 2024;5(14):108-114. (In Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.32689/2663-0672-2023-5-18

Manna A, Singh M, Khan T, Manna A.Using a panoramic radiographic study, the Panoramic Mandibular Index (PMI), Mandibular Cortical Width (MCW) or Mental Index (MI) are used to assess bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women and identify sexual dimorphism. Archives of Dental Research. 2024;14(1):28-35 https://doi.org/10.18231/j.adr.2024.006

Khaitan T, Shukla AK, Gupta P, Naik SR. Is panoramic mandibular index a reliable marker in the evaluation of bone mineral density and sexual dimorphism? J Forensic Dent Sci. 2019;11(3):133-136. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfo.jfds_92_19

Resende GP, Jordão LMR, de Souza JAC, et al. Single versus two-implant mandibular overdentures using early-loaded titanium-zirconium implants with hydrophilic surface and ball attachments: 1-year randomized clinical trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2021;32(3):359-368. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13707

Munhoz L, Morita L, Nagai AY, Moreira J, Arita ES. Mandibular cortical index in the screening of postmenopausal at low mineral density risk: a systematic review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021;50(4): 20200514. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20200514

Naseri R, Yaghini J, Feizi A. Levels of smoking and dental implants failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2020;47(4):518-528. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13257

Leles CR, Dias DR, Nogueira TE, et al. Impact of patient characteristics on edentulous subjects' preferences for prosthodontic rehabilitation with implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2019;30(3):285-292. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13414

Camargo AJ, Côrtes ARG, Aoki EM, Baladi MG, Arita ES, Watanabe PChA. Analysis of bone quality on panoramic radiograph in osteoporosis research by fractal dimension. Applied Mathematics. 2016;7(4):375-386. https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2016.74035

Kuroiedova VD, Vyzhenko YeYe, Stasiuk AA, Halych LB, Petrova AV. Optical density of different parts of jaws in orthodontic patients during dentofacial development. Actual Problems of the Modern Medicine: Bulletin of Ukrainian Medical Stomatological Academy. 2020;20(3):60-64 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31718/2077-1096.20.3.60

Luchynskyi VM, Balaban TI, Luchynskyi MA, Luchynska YuI, Stakhanska OO, Zmarko YuK. Stan metabolizmu kistkovoi tkanyny u khvorykh iz zakhvoriuvanniamy tkanyn parodonta. Odeskyi medychnyi zhurnal. 2024;2:30-34. https://doi.org/10.32782/2226-2008-2024-1

Klemetti E, Kolmakov S, Heiskanen P, Vainio P, Lassila V. Panoramic mandibular index and bone mineral densities in postmenopausal women. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993;75(6): 774-779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(93)90438-A

Lekholm U Zarb, GA., Albrektsson, T,. Patient selection and preparation. Tissue-integrated protheses. Chicago: Quintessence, 1985. - P. 199-209.

Abramoff MD, Magelhaes PJ, Ram SJ. Image Processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International. 2004;11(7):36-42. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228334776_Image_

Geiger M, Blem G, Ludwig A. Evaluation of ImageJ for Relative Bone Density Measurement and Clinical Application. J. Oral Health Craniofac Sci. 2016;1:12-21. https://doi.org.10.29328/journal.johcs.1001002

Dave RD, Patel TS, Patel PB, Patel P, Dudhia B, Bhatia P. Prediction of osteoporosis in men and women through orthopantomograph. J Oral Med Oral Surg Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2022;8(4):193-199. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jooo.2022.041

Matsyuk DI, Kuzniak NB. Analysis of the results of x-ray examination of bone tissue in patients with mandibular fractures on admission to the hospital. Stomatological Bulletin. 2024;126(1):112–117. https://doi.org/10.35220/2078-8916-2024-51-1.20

Havryltsiv ST, Vovk YV, Hrushka OI. Study of activity of biochemical indicators of bone metabolism in mandible affected by radicular cysts in patients with different mineral metabolism status. Bulletin of Scientific Research. 2019;2:72-77. https://doi.org/10.11603/2415-8798.2019.2.10017

CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DENTAL AND JAW SYSTEM STATE IN PERSONS WITH LOW MINERAL DENSITY BONE TISSUE

Abstract

Downloads

References

Most read articles by the same author(s)