FEATURES OF ESTROGEN AND PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR EXPRESSION IN MENINGIOMAS DEPENDING ON GENDER

Keywords: tumors, meningioma, immunohistochemistry, estrogen, progesterone

Abstract

Introduction. Meningiomas are non-malignant brain or spinal cord neoplasms originating from meningeal cells. The etiology of meningiomas remains insufficiently studied due to the subclinical course and relatively low incidence. Because meningiomas affect women more than twice as often as men, and there are recorded cases of the disease in pregnant women, it is advisable to investigate the role of female sex hormones in the development of this disease.

Objective. Our work aimed to study the features of the expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors in meningioma tissue depending on the gender of the patients.

Methods and matreials. A total of 50 samples were examined, of which 25 samples were from female patients (group W) and 25 from male patients (group M). The average age of patients in group W was 60.92±1.84 years, and group M was 59.88±3.39 years. Regardless of the equivalent indicators of average age, it is worth noting that the age of female patients varied 42 to 79 years and of male patients – 24 to 88 years. We examined the samples macroscopically, histologically and immunohistochemically (antibodies against estrogen and progesterone receptors).

Results. When examined macroscopically, the meningioma had a characteristic spherical or plaque-like shape, grey colour, somewhat bumpy surface, moderate density, and fibrous structure on cross-section. During the histological examination, most samples in both groups were assigned to psammomatous or meningothelial histological subtypes, the characteristic histological patterns of which were concentric structures of flattened tumour cells and psammoma bodies.

Conclusions. Immunohistochemical examination of meningioma tissue with antibodies against estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors showed their more significant presence in samples of female patients compared to samples of male patients (p<0.001), which confirms the critical role of female sex hormones in etiology and pathogenesis meningioma.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ostrom QT, Price M, Neff C, Cioffi G, Waite KA, Kruchko C, et al. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2016-2020. Neuro Oncol. 2023;25:IV1–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noad149

Marrazzo A, Cacchione A, Rossi S, Carboni A, Gandolfo C, Carai A, et al. Intradural pediatric spinal tumors: An overview from imaging to novel molecular findings. Diagnostics. 2021;11(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091710

Zouaoui S, Darlix A, Rigau V, Mathieu-Daudé H, Bauchet F, Bessaoud F, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of 13,038 newly diagnosed and histologically confirmed meningiomas in France: 2006–2010. Neurochirurgie. 2018;64(1):15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuchi.2014.11.013

Denysenko AP, Moskalenko RA. Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Literature on Meningiomas With Calcification. East Ukr Med J. 2022;10(1):98–108. https://doi.org/10.21272/eumj.2022;10(1):98-108

Vernooij MW, Ikram MA, Tanghe HL, Vincent AJPE, Hofman A, Krestin GP, et al. Incidental Findings on Brain MRI in the General Population. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(18):1821–8. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa070972

Denysenko AP, Piddubnyi AM, Tkachenko IA, Shubin PA, Tarabarov SI, Moskalenko RA. A comprehensive study of dura mater biomineralization: morphological, crystallographic, and immunohistochemical aspects. Reports Morphol. 2023;29(4):50–7. https://doi.org/10.31393/morphology-journal-2023-29(4)-07

Denysenko A, Pylypenko O, Moskalenko R, Kuzenko Y. Nanoscale Calcification of the Dura Mater. Proc 2022 IEEE 12th Int Conf "Nanomaterials Appl Prop N 2022. 2022;1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/NAP55339.2022.9934715

Braganza MZ, Kitahara CM, Berrington De González A, Inskip PD, Johnson KJ, Rajaraman P. Ionizing radiation and the risk of brain and central nervous system tumors: A systematic review. Neuro Oncol. 2012;14(11):1316–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nos208

Denysenko A, Danilchenko S, Stepanenko A, Chivanov V, Moskalenko R. A Comprehensive Study of Meningioma Biomineralization: Morphological, Crystallographic, and Immunohistochemical Aspects. Microsc Microanal. 2024;30(2):392-400. https://doi.org/10.1093/mam/ozae020

Claus EB, Calvocoressi L, Bondy ML, Schildkraut JM, Wiemels JL, Wrensch M. Family and personal medical history and risk of meningioma: Clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2011;115(6):1072–7. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.6.JNS11129

Cushing H. Charles C Thomas. Meningiomas. Their Classification, Regional Behaviour, Life History, and Surgical End Results. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association. 1938; 27(2), 185.

Wiemels J, Wrensch M, Claus EB. Epidemiology and etiology of meningioma. J Neurooncol. 2010;99(3):307–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-010-0386-3

Agopiantz M, Carnot M, Denis C, Martin E, Gauchotte G. Hormone Receptor Expression in Meningiomas: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15030980

Lusis EA, Scheithauer BW, Yachnis AT, Fischer BR, Chicoine MR, Paulus W, et al. Meningiomas in pregnancy: A clinicopathologic study of 17 cases. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(5):951–61. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e31826adf65

Moskalenko Y. Biological mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors and overcoming this resistance: Challenges in medical oncology. Regul Mech Biosyst. 2024;15(1):83–91. https://doi.org/10.15421/022412

Skoryk OD, Horila M V. Oxidative stress and disruption of the antioxidant defense system as triggers of diseases. Regul Mech Biosyst. 2023;14(4):665–72. https://doi.org/10.15421/022395

Portet S, Banor T, Bousquet J, Simonneau A, Flores M, Ingrand P, et al. New Insights into Expression of Hormonal Receptors by Meningiomas. World Neurosurg. 2020;140:e87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.04.168

Vadivelu S, Sharer L, Schulder M. Regression of multiple intracranial meningiomas after cessation of long-term progesterone agonist therapy: Case report. J Neurosurg. 2010;112(5):920–4. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.8.JNS09201

Hsu DW, Efird JT, Hedley-Whyte ET. Progesterone and estrogen receptors in meningiomas: Prognostic considerations. J Neurosurg. 1997;86(1):113–20. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1997.86.1.0113

Kuroi Y, Matsumoto K, Shibuya M, Kasuya H. Progesterone Receptor Is Responsible for Benign Biology of Skull Base Meningioma. World Neurosurg. 2018;118:e918–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.100

Verheijen FM, Sprong M, Jacobs HM, Donker GH, Amelink GJ, Thijssen JHH, et al. Progesterone receptor isoform expression in human meningiomas. Eur J Cancer. 2001;37(12):1488–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00146-0

Carroll RS, Zhang J, Black PML. Expression of estrogen receptors alpha and beta in human meningiomas. J Neurooncol. 1999;42(2):109–16. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006158514866

Korhonen K, Salminen T, Raitanen J, Auvinen A, Isola J, Haapasalo H. Female predominance in meningiomas can not be explained by differences in progesterone, estrogen, or androgen receptor expression. J Neurooncol. 2006;80(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-006-9146-9

Pravdenkova S, Al-Mefty O, Sawyer J, Husain M. Progesterone and estrogen receptors: Opposing prognostic indicators in meningiomas. J Neurosurg. 2006;105(2):163–73. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2006.105.2.163

Published
2024-06-24
How to Cite
Kmyta, O., Budko, H., Ivakhnyuk, T., & Schtainberger, R. (2024). FEATURES OF ESTROGEN AND PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR EXPRESSION IN MENINGIOMAS DEPENDING ON GENDER. Eastern Ukrainian Medical Journal, 12(2), 398-405. https://doi.org/10.21272/eumj.2024;12(2):398-405
Section
ORIGINAL RESEARCH. SURGERY