THE PERSPECTIVES OF CELLULAR THERAPY IN REHABILITATION TREATMENT OF NEUROLOGICAL PATIENTS (REVIEW OF LITERATURE WITH OWN RESEARCH DATA)
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

angiogenesis, neuronal stem cells, cell therapy, repair

How to Cite

V. Lychko. (2019). THE PERSPECTIVES OF CELLULAR THERAPY IN REHABILITATION TREATMENT OF NEUROLOGICAL PATIENTS (REVIEW OF LITERATURE WITH OWN RESEARCH DATA). Eastern Ukrainian Medical Journal, 7(4), 306-315. Retrieved from https://eumj.med.sumdu.edu.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/50

Abstract

The article gathers and analyses modern data from foreign and regional authors regarding the latest achievements in cellular technologies that have prospects in rehabilitation of neurological patients. For the replacement of damaged brain tissue, technologies directed for differentiation of stem cells in neuronal and glial directions are extremely promising. Today, it is feasible to expect that in the near future this will enable the transplantation of cells to activate the processes of neuroplasticity in recovery period.

The data of own researches, which examined changes in structural and functional characteristics of brain tissue of rats with condition of experimental acute focal cerebral ischemia (AFCI) in dynamics of treatment cryopreserved cord blood serum (CCBS) was given for evaluation of its membrane protection, immune modulation and proangiogenic activity.

The study was conducted on 60 outbred white male Wistar rats weighing 200±20 g. All animals were divided into 3 groups: 1st group (controls) – intact rats without trauma and treatment; 2nd group – animals after modelling AFCI without treatment; 3rd group – rats after modelling AFCI, which was administered CCBS.

The results of the study indicated the stimulating effect of the components of CCBS on restoration of ultrastructure of the damaged capillaries, increasing their density, as well as the formation of new capillaries. It was found that the average area of the perivascular spaces, which is an indicator of vasogenic edema in rats of group 2 is 45 times higher than that in group 1, while in rats in group 3 treated with CCBS, this figure was exceeded 37 times. The average area of pericellular spaces, indicating the degree of cytotoxic edema, in rats of group 2 on the 7th day after AFCI is almost 23 times higher than the results of group 1. This indicator in rats of group 3 was increased by 20 times compared with group 2. On the 7th day of the experiment in rats of group 2, the surface area of endothelial cells was significantly larger than in rats of groups 1 and 3 by 54.1% and 31.6% respectively.

Neurotrophic therapy is a very promising area of regenerative medicine, which requires further study in the use of growth factors.

PDF (Українська)

References

1. Bang OY. [Stem cell therapy for stroke: lessons learned from recent successful randomized trials of interventional therapy for stroke]. Precision and Future Medicine. 2018;2(3):109–116. doi: 10.23838/pfm.2018.00058.
2. Chen LK, Qiu R, Xu Q. [Stem cell therapy for ischemic stroke]. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. 2014;14(1):976–982. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2014.8762.
3. Tang YH, Ma YY, Zhang ZJ et al. [Opportunities and challenges: stem cell-based therapy for the treatment of ischemic stroke]. Cns Neuroscience & Therapeutics. 2015;21(4):337–347. doi: 10.1111/cns.12386.
4. Vaturi M, Lev EI. [Acute stroke and attenuation in endothelial progenitor cells: cause or effect?]. Israel Medical Association Journal. 2019;21(2):120–131.
5. Bang OY, Kim EH, Cha JM et al. [Adult stem cell therapy for stroke: challenges and progress]. Journal of Stroke. 2016;18(3):256–266. doi: 10.5853/jos.2016.01263.
6. Harrison SE, Sozen B, Christodoulou N et al. [Assembly of embryonic and extraembryonic stem cells to mimic embryogenesis in vitro]. Science. 2017;356(6334): 1810–1824. doi: 10.1126/science.aal1810.
7. Medvinsky A, Livesey FJ. [On human development: lessons from stem cell systems]. Development. 2015;142(1):17–20. doi: 10.1242/dev.114868.
8. Rizzino A, Wuebben EL. [Sox2/Oct4: A delicately balanced partnership in pluripotent stem cells and embryogenesis]. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta-Gene Regulatory Mechanisms. 2016;1859(6):780–791. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2016.03.006.
9. Schatten H, Sun QY, Prather RS. [Mitochondrial differentiation in early embryo cells and pluripotent stem cells]. Journal of Stroke. 2014;14(2): 247–258.
10. Ding YQ, Li XY, Xia GN et al. [ProBDNF inhibits collective migration and chemotaxis of rat Schwann cells]. Tissue & Cell. 2016;48(5):503–510. doi: 10.1016/j.tice.2016.07.002.
11. Qian TM, Zhao LL, Wang J et al. [miR-148b-3p promotes migration of Schwann cells by targeting cullin-associated and neddylation-dissociated 1]. Neural Regeneration Research. 2016;11(6):1001–1005. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.184504.
12. Wen L, Xu J, Zhan TX et al. [The occurrence of diffuse axonal injury in the brain: associated with the accumulation and clearance of myelin debris]. Neural Regeneration Research. 2014;9(21):1902–1906. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.145358.
13. Ehrhart J, Sanberg PR, Garbuzova-Davis S. [Plasma derived from human umbilical cord blood: Potential cell-additive or cell-substitute therapeutic for neurodegenerative diseases]. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 2018;22(12):6157–6166. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13898.
14. Lin W, Hsuan YC, Lin MT et al. [Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells preserve adult newborn neurons and reduce neurological injury after cerebral ischemia by reducing the number of hypertrophic microglia/macrophages]. Cell Transplant. 2017;26(11):1798–1810. doi: 10.1177/0963689717728936.
15. Neirinckx V, Rogister B, Franzen R et al. [Bone marrow stromal stem cells transplantation in mice with acute spinal cord injury]. Animal Models for Stem Cell Therapy. 2014;1213:257–264. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1453-1_21.
16. Gioia U, Di Carlo V, Caramanica P et al. [Mir-23a and mir-125b regulate neural stem/progenitor cell proliferation by targeting Musashi 1]. Rna Biology. 2014;11(9):1105–1112. doi: 10.4161/rna.35508.
17. Schira J, Gasis M, Estrada V et al. [Significant clinical, neuropathological and behavioural recovery from acute spinal cord trauma by transplantation of a well-defined somatic stem cell from human umbilical cord blood]. Brain. 2012;135:431–446. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr222.
18. Kaneko K, Higuchi C, Naka N et al. [Expression of noggin, an antagonist of bone morphogenetic protein, in schwannoma: a possible mechanism]. Oncology Letters. 2014;8(1):111–116. doi: 10.3892/ol.2014.2138.
19. Hosseini SM, Farahmandnia M, Razi Z et al. [Combination cell therapy with mesenchymal stem cells and neural stem cells for brain stroke in rats]. International Journal of Stem Cells. 2015;8(1):99–105. doi: 10.15283/ijsc.2015.8.1.99.
20. Liu KM, Guo L, Zhou ZJ et al. [Mesenchymal stem cells transfer mitochondria into cerebral microvasculature and promote recovery from ischemic stroke]. Microvascular Research. 2019;123:74–80. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2019.01.001.
21. Peplow PV. [Growth factor- and cytokine-stimulated endothelial progenitor cells in post-ischemic cerebral neovascularization]. Neural Regeneration Research. 2014;9(15):1425–1429. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.139457.
22. Bhasin A, Srivastava MVP, Bhatia R et al. [Functional connectivity after autologous bone marrow derived stem cell transplantation in stroke patients through diffusion tensor imaging]. Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2014;37:48–53.
23. Mir O, Savitz SI. [Stem cell therapy in stroke treatment: is it a viable option?]. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics. 2013;13(2):119–121. doi: 10.1586/ern.12.164.
24. Boshuizen MCS, Steinberg GK. [Stem cell-based immunomodulation after stroke: effects on brain repair processes]. Stroke. 2018;49(6):1563–1570. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.117.020465.
25. Teng H, Zhang ZG, Wang L et al. [Coupling of angiogenesis and neurogenesis in cultured endothelial cells and neural progenitor cells after stroke]. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 2008;28(4):764–771. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600573.